nsains.blogg.se

Neutron vs fabfilter pro q
Neutron vs fabfilter pro q











neutron vs fabfilter pro q neutron vs fabfilter pro q

Not that I probably couldn't have achieved the same sound with Pro-Q, but simply that I probably wouldn't have done it in just that way or approached the problem in the same way-simply because the interface was different. I'm a big fan of the Fab Filter plug-ins and Pro-Q is incredibly useful for spectral surgery-I like the visualization, it's easy to place the q-point I want, there are lots of options for phase control, etc.ĭespite that, I definitely remember loading up a PSP AudioWare parametric EQ (I think it was their Classic Q or their Console Q) and while it didn't leave me with a lot of control, it was instantly musical and I appreciated the ease at which I arrived at a pleasing sound. Some processors will have useful visualizations or Mid/Side processing or other features that you find useful, try them out, see what works for you. Generally, cutting more than boosting is a pretty good rule of thumb.ĮQing as a process alters the phase of your program material-this may be important or not to your particular needs, but it is one significant feature that distinguishes EQ processors. If you synthesize your own sounds, try making their EQ clean from the get-go, and you don't have to EQ as much to get them to fit in the mix. If you hold Ctrl while dragging the EQ band, it drags more precisely.Ĭheck reference mixes if you feel that helps. Pay close attention to how the EQ edit you are doing changes the sound, and try to find middle ground don't neglect to boost very high, then cut very low, to narrow in on that optimal gain on the EQ band. Some tips I would give for cleaner EQing (less overboosts, less excessive cuts, etc) are: I don't use that quite as much, though, for typical EQing, since it is more RAM-heavy and really accomplishes the same thing with negligibly higher precision (plus it doesn't have as good of a visualization feature IMO). I do also have FabFilter Pro-Q, which is a more precise EQ plugin that has a standard deviation of 0.01 dB, as compared to Fruity Parametric EQ 2, where its standard deviation is 0.1 dB. I still love to use Fruity Parametric EQ 2 for its visualization feature, and I'm probably not going to stop using it anytime soon.













Neutron vs fabfilter pro q